Screening For Psoriatic Arthritis Discussion
Critiquing Your Articles Assignment Module 2 Assignment 2
- Complete a review of the literature and select a minimum of 3 articles that are appropriate research articles related to your question. A research article may be quantitative, qualitative, or integrative. A research article may to related to a Quality Improvement study, an Evidence-Based Practice study, or a Research article that reports new knowledge.
- Critique each of the articles using the appropriate Appraisal Form below, either C, E, or F.
- If a question included in the form you selected is not applicable to your particular study, select option 3, Not Clear. Screening For Psoriatic Arthritis Discussion
- An Integrative Review, Appraisal form C, can be used for a meta-analysis or systematic review.
- All Appraisals have room for comments as you go through the form. A final comment is required in the space provided at the end of each appraisal form. Even if you comment throughout the form, COMPLETE THE FINAL SECTION THAT SAYS “COMMENTS.”
PLACE YOUR ORDER HERE NOW
| Rubric for Appendix F | ||
| Rubric for Appendix F | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Appendix C, E, or F Form Completion | 100 to >80 pts
Proficient Three appraisal forms have been submitted. They are completely filled out. All yes/no questions are answered, including citations, Comments, and open-ended questions are completed. The correct forms are used based on the type of article. If a question included in the form you selected is not applicable to your particular study, select option 3, Not Clear. Screening For Psoriatic Arthritis Discussion 80 to >0 pts Competent At least two appraisal forms have been submitted. They are mostly filled out. All or most of the yes/no questions have been answered. Citations are included, Comments and open-ended questions are mostly filled out. The correct forms are used based on the type of article. If a question included in the form you selected is not applicable to your particular study, select option 3, Not Clear. 0 pts Novice Only 1 or no appraisal form has been submitted. The submission is partially filled out with yes/no questions and only one or two of the written comments/questions filled in. The correct form used based on the type of article. |
/ 100 pts |
APPENDIX E
Appraisal Guide:
Findings of a Qualitative Study
Citation: Silverthorne et al. (2022)
Silverthorne, C. A., Bowen, C., Lord, J., McHugh, N., Tillett, W., Dures, E., & Lissina, A. (2022). A qualitative study of patients’ experiences of screening for psoriatic arthritis. British Journal of Dermatology, 187(6), 1037. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.21825
Synopsis
What experience, situation, or subculture does the researcher seek to understand?
The researchers seek to understand the experiences of patients with psoriasis regarding screening for Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and the diagnosis process, focusing on their perceptions, feelings, and reactions to being screened and diagnosed with the condition.
Does the researcher want to produce a description of an experience, a social process, or an event, or is the goal to generate a theory?
The researcher aimed to produce a detailed description of the experience of PsA screening and diagnosis from the patients’ perspective.
How was data collected?
Data were collected through semi-structured telephone interviews with patients with psoriasis who participated in an RCT on screening for PsA symptoms. The approach allowed flexibility to explore specific responses in depth.
How did the researcher control his or her biases and preconceptions?
The study used a structured framework (Framework Analysis Approach) for data analysis, ensuring both predefined and emergent themes were systematically addressed, which helps reduce researcher bias.
Are specific pieces of data (e.g., direct quotes) and more generalized statements (themes, theories) included in the report?
Yes, specific quotes are provided to illustrate patient experiences and feelings, along with broader themes that emerged from the analysis.
What are the main findings of the study?
The study found that patients generally viewed PsA screening as positive and reassuring. Four main themes emerged: living with psoriasis and PsA, screening experience, gaining control, and considerations for future screening programs. Patients felt listened to, appreciated the knowledge gained about PsA, and reported improved self-management and relief from knowing their diagnosis status. Screening For Psoriatic Arthritis Discussion
Credibility
Is the study published in a source
that required peer review? Yes No Not clear
Were the methods used appropriate
to the study purpose? Yes No Not clear
Was the sampling of observations or
interviews appropriate and varied
enough to serve the purpose of the study? Yes No Not clear
*Were data collection methods
effective in obtaining in-depth data? Yes No Not clear
Did the data collection methods
avoid the possibility of oversight,
underrepresentation, or
overrepresentation from certain
types of sources? Yes No Not clear
Were data collection and analysis
intermingled in a dynamic way? Yes No Not clear
*Is the data presented in ways that
provide a vivid portrayal of what was
experienced or happened and its
context? Yes No Not clear
*Does the data provided justify
generalized statements, themes,
or theory? Yes No Not clear
Are the findings credible? Yes All Yes Some No
Clinical Significance
*Are the findings rich and informative? Yes No Not clear
*Is the perspective provided
potentially useful in providing
insight, support, or guidance
for assessing patient status
or progress? Yes Some No Not clear
Are the findings
clinically significant? Yes All Yes Some No
* = Important criteria
Comments
The study provides a valuable perspective on the experiences of patients with psoriatic Arthritis regarding PsA screening and diagnosis, highlighting the importance of patient-centered approaches in clinical care. The use of semi-structured interviews and the framework analysis approach enabled the researchers to capture critical insights and identify themes reflecting patients’ appreciation for high-quality, attentive care, increased awareness of PsA, and improved self-management. The qualitative focus aligns well with the study’s objective to understand patients’ experiences, offering findings that could improve PsA screening practices, hence reducing diagnostic delays and improving outcomes. Screening For Psoriatic Arthritis Discussion
