Review Of A Bill Discussion Paper
Discuss the major provisions of the Bill.
One of the provisions of the Bill is that the public and private employers in acute care hospitals must supply the employees who provide direct services to patients with personal protective equipment. Besides, the Bill also requires all employers to ensure that the employees use the personal protective equipment supplied to them (California Legislative Information, 2020)Review Of A Bill Discussion Paper. Another provision of the Bill requires the employer to maintain a supply of personal protective equipment that can last up to three months following typical; consumption. Through this, the employees will be guaranteed enough protective equipment all through. If an employer does not adhere to this regulation, the Bill authorizes a civil penalty of $25000 for every violation to stock protective equipment supplies for up to three months (California Legislative Information, 2020).
PLACE YOUR ORDER HERE NOW
However, the penalty is not applicable if the hospital fails to supply the PPEs to the employees due to issues that are beyond their control. Another provision of the Bill is that the general acute care hospitals must be ready to report the highest 7-day consecutive daily consumption of the PPE during the 2019 calendar year to the Department of Industrial Relations (TrackBill, 2020).
Demonstrate an in-depth understanding of the legislation by explaining the background and all relevant facts.
The background of the legislation was following the Covid 19 pandemic. According to California Legislative Information (2020), the local health departments in California had reported 30,125 positive Covid-19 cases by August 23, 2020. This was an indication that the nurses were not being protected, hence the need for all employers to ensure that they protect the nurses by giving them the protective equipment. Besides being infected with Covid 19, the nurses were exposed to other asymptomatic diseases. Besides, the nurses and other health care workers were not given priority testing considering that they are essential employees who are always exposed to risks. Following this, the United States Department of Labor and the United States Department of health and human services encouraged all the employers to ensure they have stocked up on face masks and respirators in advance (Lewis, 2022)Review Of A Bill Discussion Paper.
Discuss any relevant history related to the legislation, pertinent votes, issues stalling the legislation, etc.
The history related to the legislation is the high rates of nurse infections. Nurses should be protected while working since they play crucial roles in the healthcare department. Following this, different stakeholders ensured the Bill was signed into law to protect the nurses’ welfare and health (TrackBill, 2020). Some of the issues stalling the legislation are that it needed to be re-referred to the committee on appropriations. The House Committee on Appropriations was required to be involved in funding the procedure until the Bill was signed into law (Lewis, 2022)Review Of A Bill Discussion Paper. Following this can take a while, especially if the committee is busy with other activities. The Bill had many Ayes compared to the Noes votes; hence, it was easy to pass.
Identify key supporters and those who do not support the Bill. Explain why some of these individuals support the Bill and why some do not.
Some of the key supporters of the Bill include Aguiar-Curry, Arambula, Bauer-Kahan, Berman, Bloom, Boerner Horvath, Bonta, Brough, Burke, Calderon, Carrillo, Cervantes, Chau, Chiu, Cooley, Cooper, Daly, Diep, Friedman, Gabriel, Cristina Garcia, Eduardo Garcia, Gipson, Gloria, Gonzalez, Gray, Grayson, Holden, Jones-Sawyer, Kalra, Kamlager, Levine, Limón, Low, Maienschein, McCarty, Medina, Mullin, Muratsuchi and Rendon (TrackBill, 2020). The supporters argue that the Bill will help protect healthcare workers so that it is easier for them to deliver quality care to patients. As a result, it will help protect both the workers and help in creating a co9nducive workplace. Through this, the nurses will be comfortable when working, and this is enough motivation for them to deliver the best patient care. Some of the non-supporters of the Bill include Bigelow, Brough, Choi, Cooley, Megan Dahle, Flora, Gallagher, Irwin, Kiley, Lackey, Mathis, Obernolte, Patterson, and Voepel. The non-supporters argued that the Bill was too expensive and that some local hospitals could not afford to adhere to the rules. For example, it is costly to stick up to three months of protective equipment supplies due to a lack of enough finances. Review Of A Bill Discussion Paper
Explore the positions of the critical stakeholders in the Bill, both pros and cons. Do not make assumptions about potential vital stakeholders. Examine this area carefully so you correctly reflect the stakeholder’s positions.
One of the key stakeholders in this Bill is the Senate. The Senate includes the Senate labor, Pub.EMP and RET. Committee. The committee members who voted Ayes included Hill, Jackson, Mitchell, and Pan, and the one who voted Noes was Morrell. The Senate Appropriations committee includes Portantino, Bradford, Hill, Leyva, Wieckowski, Bates, and Jones. The senate committee helped ensure that passing the Bill into law was simple and transparent. All the details of the Bill were presented so that the members should make informed decisions about it. Another important stakeholder is the California governor Gavin Newsom. Newsom signed the Legislation on September 29, 2020, and it became the latest legislative enactment designed to protect the employees from the Covid 19 exposure. Review Of A Bill Discussion Paper
Discuss how the Bill would impact a nurse’s ability to provide safe and quality care or practice to the nursing license’s highest scope.
Nurses are critical since they ensure that patients can get quality services. Following this, the Bill is crucial as it guides how employers take care of the nurses. The care given to the nurses is ten translated to the patients. Considering the nurse shortage in the country, the nurses available must be protected. The provisions of the Bill give different ways in which the nurses and other healthcare workers can be protected. When a nurse is protected, the patients are also protected. If the nurses are given the protective equipment, and the employer ensures that they wear them, the hospital’s number of infections will be reduced. As a result, the patients and other people visiting the hospital will not spread the virus. If a nurse is infected since they do not have the protective ears, they will not be able to provide quality care to all patients; hence healthcare delivery will be affected negatively. Besides, the nurses will always be comfortable working since they know they are safe and protected from infections. It will also increase the employer-employee relationships, hence creating good working conditions.
Explain specific actions that nurses can take to assist with the passage or defeat of the legislation
Nurses and other healthcare workers are benefiting more from the Bill. Once there is a pandemic, the nurses are always on the frontline to deal with the patients. Following this, they need to be protected, and the healthcare institutions must ensure they adhere to these measures. Consequently, the nurses should encourage their employers to stock up on the protective equipment as required by the Bill. If there are not enough supplies, the nurses can report to the Labor department since their health will be at risk while working. Also, the nurses can send their representatives to make announcements about the Bill and how it will help them deliver quality patient care to all patients. The nurses can also old a campaign and appoint a speaker or two who will explain the benefits of the Bill. Since there is a shortage of nurses, the Bill helps protect their interests; hence the legislators will consider passing the Bill Review Of A Bill Discussion Paper.
References
California Legislative Information. (2020, September 30). Bill Text. Retrieved May 26, 2022, from https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB2537
Lewis, J. 2. (2022). Governor Signs Legislation Requiring Provision and Maintenance of Personal Protective Equipment for Health Care Employees Due to Covid-19. National Law Review, 10(274). https://www.natlawreview.com/article/governor-signs-legislation-requiring-provision-and-maintenance-personal-protective
ORDER HERE NOW
TrackBill. (2020, September 29). AB2537 | California 2019-2020 | Personal Protective Equipment: Health Care Employees. | TrackBill. Legislative Tracking Software | TrackBill. Retrieved May 26, 2022, from https://trackbill.com/bill/california-assembly-bill-2537-personal-protective-equipment-health-care-employees/1900782/ Review Of A Bill Discussion Paper
