NRNP 6645 Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Comparing Group, Family, and Individual Settings

NRNP 6645 Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Comparing Group, Family, and Individual Settings

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Comparing Group, Family, and Individual Settings

Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is a very effective form of treatment, and it is recommended as the first intervention for mental disorders such as anxiety and depression in both adolescents and adults, according to the NICE Clinical Guidelines and other sources (Epel et al., 2021). As a result, CBT can be used in family therapy, group therapy, and one-on-one therapy. In group counseling, CBT is used to assist individuals with comparable mental disorders and therapeutic objectives in enhancing their resilience and acquiring novel strategies to manage their symptoms. This is achieved via collaboration with a group therapist. So, the group therapist has to focus on helping the group reach its goals before the session ends. When it comes to families, the CBT method focuses on how family members connect and how that affects how well or how poorly the family works as a whole. Individual therapy using CBT stresses helping people learn how to help themselves.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NRNP 6645 Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Comparing Group, Family, and Individual Settings
Just from $12/Page
Order Essay

PMHNPs may encounter more difficulties while conducting group therapy sessions as opposed to family or individual sessions. Preserving the privacy and secrecy of each group member and effectively addressing conflicts involving disruptive individuals are among the challenges faced in this context (Alavi et al., 2021). Therapists often have challenges in creating a safe and open atmosphere for sharing due to the limitations above. According to Abeditehrani et al. (2020), some participants may intentionally withhold confidential information that may have potentially aided in their recovery. Consequently, it might be challenging to cultivate respect among group members and ensure equitable treatment for everyone in the event of a disruptive member. In order to ensure a successful group therapy session, group therapists need to use suitable approaches that facilitate the cultivation of respect and equitable involvement among all group members.

Each supporting source is deemed scholarly due to its publication in recognized academic publications. “Clinical Psychology in Europe” and “Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy” are peer-reviewed academic publications specializing in publishing research within psychology. The journal “Children” is a freely accessible publication disseminates research on child development and psychology. The papers also include citations and references to other academic sources, demonstrating that the writers have comprehensively examined the current material. In addition, the papers are equipped with DOIs, which serve as distinctive identifiers for academic publications.

References

Abeditehrani, H., Dijk, C., Sahragard Toghchi, M., & Arntz, A. (2020). Integrating cognitive behavioral group therapy and psychodrama for a social anxiety disorder: An intervention description and an uncontrolled pilot trial. Clinical Psychology in Europe2(1). https://doi.org/10.32872/cpe.v2i1.2693

Alavi, S. S., Ghanizadeh, M., Mohammadi, M. R., Jannatifard, F., Esmaeeli Alamooti, S., & Farahani, M. (2021). The effects of cognitive-behavioral-group therapy on reducing the symptoms of an internet addiction disorder and promoting the quality of life and mental health. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy43(1). https://doi.org/10.47626/2237-6089-2020-0010

Epel, N., Zohar, A. A., Artom, A., Novak, A. M., & Lev-Ari, S. (2021). The Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy on Children’s Self-Esteem. Children8(11), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8110958

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Comparing Group, Family, and Individual Settings

There are significant differences in the applications of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for families and individuals. The same is true for CBT in group settings and CBT in family settings. In your role, it is essential to understand these differences to appropriately apply this therapeutic approach across multiple settings. For this Discussion, as you compare the use of CBT in individual, group, and family settings, consider challenges of using this approach with groups you may lead, as well as strategies for overcoming those challenges.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To prepare:

  • Review the videos in this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights provided on CBT in various settings.

 

By Day 3

Post an explanation of how the use of CBT in groups compares to its use in family or individual settings. Explain at least two challenges PMHNPs might encounter when using CBT in one of these settings. Support your response with specific examples from this week’s media and at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly and attach the PDFs of your sources.

Upload a copy of your discussion writing to the draft Turnitin for plagiarism check.  Your faculty holds the academic freedom to not accept your work and grade at a zero if your work is not uploaded as a draft submission to Turnitin as instructed.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.

 

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two of your colleagues by recommending strategies to overcome the challenges your colleagues have identified. Support your recommendation with evidence-based literature and/or your own experiences with clients.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post Reply!

 

Search entries or author Search entries or author

 

 

Filter replies by unread

NRNP_6645_Week5_Discussion_Rubric

NRNP_6645_Week5_Discussion_Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting:Response to the discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
44 to >39.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Thoroughly responds to the discussion question(s)…. Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources…. No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth…. Supported by at least 3 current credible sources.

39 to >34.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Responds to most of the discussion question(s)…. Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. 50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth…. Supported by at least 3 credible references.

34 to >30.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Responds to some of the discussion question(s)…. One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed…. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis…. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. Post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references.

30 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not respond to the discussion question(s)…. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria…. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis…. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module…. Contains only 1 or no credible references.

44 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting:Writing
6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Written clearly and concisely…. Contains no grammatical or spelling errors…. Further adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

5 to >4.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Written concisely…. May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors…. Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

4 to >3.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Written somewhat concisely…. May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors…. Contains some APA formatting errors.

3 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Not written clearly or concisely…. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors…. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Main Posting:Timely and full participation
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts main discussion by due date.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Posts main discussion by due date…. Meets requirements for full participation.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts main discussion by due date.

6 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post main discussion by due date.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responds to questions posed by faculty…. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response:Writing
6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed…. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources…. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 to >4.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed…. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources…. Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 to >3.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed…. Few or no credible sources are cited.

3 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication…. Response to faculty questions are missing…. No credible sources are cited.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome First Response:Timely and full participation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts by due date.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Meets requirements for full participation…. Posts by due date.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts by due date.

2 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post by due date.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response:Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
9 to >8.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings…. Responds to questions posed by faculty…. The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response is on topic, may have some depth.

6 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Response may not be on topic, lacks depth.

9 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response:Writing
6 to >5.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed…. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources…. Response is effectively written in Standard, Edited English.

5 to >4.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues…. Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed…. Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources…. Response is written in Standard, Edited English.

4 to >3.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Response posed in the discussion may lack effective professional communication…. Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed…. Few or no credible sources are cited.

3 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective communication…. Response to faculty questions are missing…. No credible sources are cited.

6 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Response:Timely and full participation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent Point range: 90–100

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation…. Posts by due date.

4 to >3.0 ptsGood Point range: 80–89

Meets requirements for full participation…. Posts by due date.

3 to >2.0 ptsFair Point range: 70–79

Posts by due date.

2 to >0 ptsPoor Point range: 0–69

Does not meet requirements for full participation…. Does not post by due date.

5 pts
Total Points: