NRNP 6635 WEEK 7 Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Schizophrenia, Other Psychotic Disorders, and Medication-Induced Movement Disorders

NRNP 6635 WEEK 7 Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Schizophrenia, Other Psychotic Disorders, and Medication-Induced Movement Disorders

Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Schizophrenia, Other Psychotic Disorders, and Medication-Induced Movement Disorders

The case study presents Ms. Fatima Branning, a 28-year-old woman from Coronado, CA. She has a bachelor’s degree in hospitality and works as an administrative assistant in the car sales department. She presently receives chiropractic therapy for her scoliosis, which she developed in the past. She refutes the existence of familial mental health disorders and reports latex allergies, as well as normal menstruation without the use of birth control. This paper examines the patient’s mental evaluation, differential diagnoses, and analytical reasoning process. This paper also addresses the patient’s symptoms, length, intensity, and life effects while reflecting on future sessions, legal implications, health promotion, and illness prevention.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
NRNP 6635 WEEK 7 Assessing and Diagnosing Patients With Schizophrenia, Other Psychotic Disorders, and Medication-Induced Movement Disorders
Just from $12/Page
Order Essay

Subjective:

CC (chief complaint): “Training title 9.”

HPI: F.B., a 28-year-old woman with mental health issues, was admitted to the mental health facility because her employer could fire her. The woman claims her boss’s job is jeopardized because of her supervisor’s affection for her. She disputes any allegations of inappropriate behavior or sexual harassment by her employer. She draws attention by showcasing her strength as a woman. However, her boss insists that she has not been successful in generating any sales over the past three weeks. According to her, the causes include a sluggish month as well as health difficulties, such as a tumor on her neck and lower back discomfort that extends from her back. She contends that the mental strain that she experienced as a result of her employment was the root cause of her health issues, including the development of cancer. In order to treat her history of hypothyroidism, she discloses that she has been taking levothyroxine throughout her treatment.

Past Psychiatric History:

  • General Statement: The patient refuses to discuss her prior mental history.
  • Caregivers (if applicable): mother
  • Hospitalizations: denies any prior history of hospitalization.
  • Medication trials: The woman claims she is not taking any medications for mental illness.
  • Psychotherapy or Previous Psychiatric Diagnosis: Refuses to disclose her current circumstances to anybody.

Substance Current Use and History: denies abusing alcohol, cigarettes, or any other drug. No history of substance addiction issues exists.

Family Psychiatric/Substance Use History: There is no documented family history of drug addiction or mental health issues.

Psychosocial History: The patient’s home is Coronado, California. Her parents raised her. Her background is in hospitality, and she now works as an administrator’s assistant within the used car sales department. She is receiving chiropractic therapy for her history of scoliosis. She says there are no mental health problems in the family. She thinks that she is about to be fired because her boss loves her.

Medical History: The patient reports having scoliosis in the past.

  • Current Medications: The patient gets chiropractic treatment without taking any medications.
  • Allergies: the patient records an allergy to latex.
  • Reproductive Hx: The patient identifies as heterosexual. The patient says she does not have a history of reproductive issues and that her menstrual periods are regular.

ROS:

  • GENERAL: No changes in weight, hunger, pyrexia, weariness, or general weakness have occurred recently.
  • HEENT: Head: No signs of cranial trauma or prior concussions. There is no ringing, discharge, itching, soreness, or discomfort in the ears. Eyes: Clear sight without corrective lenses, excessive tearing, diplopia, or pruritus. No erythema, discomfort, obstruction, nasal discharge, or epistaxis. Oral Cavity & Pharynx: No dental pain, pharyngitis, dysphonia, gingival bleeding, or dysphagia.
  • SKIN: The complexity of skin differs throughout ethnic groups. No hives, erythema, pruritus, swellings, or dermal eruptions are present.
  • CARDIOVASCULAR: Absence of cyanosis, pain, palpitations, edema, or chest tightness.
  • RESPIRATORY: Absence of wheezing, chest congestion, cough, sneezing, or dyspnea.
  • GASTROINTESTINAL: There is no hernia, discomfort, abdominal distension, constipation, or altered bowel habits.
  • GENITOURINARY: Consistent menstrual cycles. No dysuria, nocturnal enuresis, changed urinary frequency, or trouble beginning micturition.
  • NEUROLOGICAL: There is no headache, dizziness, blurred vision, or unconsciousness.
  • MUSCULOSKELETAL: There are no sore joints or muscles. Joints have a full range of motion without restriction.
  • HAEMATOLOGIC: There is no history of slow healing, bruise susceptibility, or hematologic diseases.
  • LYMPHATICS: states that there has never been lymphadenopathy.
  • ENDOCRINOLOGIC: No signs of excessive thirst, polyuria, or polydipsia.

Objective:

Vitals: Temperature: 98.4°F, Pulse: 82 bpm, Respiratory Rate: 18 breaths/min, Heart Rate: 124/74 mmHg, Height: 5’0″, Weight: 118 pounds

Diagnostic results: A CBC and other vital blood tests are necessary to evaluate the patient’s health and exclude medical conditions. Toxicological analysis, together with urine and blood tests, is essential for identifying chemicals in the patient (Muñoz-Negro et al., 2020).

Assessment:

Mental Status Examination: The 28-year-old female seems to have invested care in her looks and is attired suitably for her age. She has a profound comprehension of temporal, spatial, and interpersonal dynamics. Her discourse is characterized by clarity and intellectual precision. Her intelligence quotient is low, and her reasoning skills are lacking. She asserts that she does not have any suicidal or delusional thoughts or feelings—every one of her memories, whether short-term or long-term, has been kept. Throughout the conversation, she is kind and agreeable, but she is hesitant to discuss her mental health issue in further detail. The look on her face is entirely consistent with how she expresses her sorrow.

Differential Diagnoses:

  1. Delusional disorder: Delusional disorder, as delineated by the DSM-V, is characterized by at least one delusional episode persisting for a month or more in persons exhibiting normal behavior (González-Rodríguez et al., 2022). Subgroups such as nihilistic, erotomaniac, grandiose, somatic, persecutory, and referential may be distinguished. In the case study, the patient displays indications of erotomania, convinced of a love relationship with another individual. Given her lack of other psychotic symptoms and her history of hypothyroidism—which is associated with hallucination disorder—this diagnosis is accurate.
  2. Delirium disorder: According to the DSM-V, delirium is a condition marked by disturbances in attention, consciousness, and baseline cognitive function (Oldham, 2021). It should also encompass variations in cognitive function during the day and brief intervals of disruption. In the case above study, a patient exhibited disorientation and confusion attributed to her illness, which was misdiagnosed as symptoms of hypothyroidism related to her occupation. Nevertheless, she showed no indications of orientation difficulties or hallucinations, which contradicts the diagnosis.
  3. Narcissistic personality disorder: Narcissistic personality disorder is defined by an exaggerated sense of self-importance, a need for excessive admiration, a deficiency in empathy, and challenges in connecting with others (Uriawan et al., 2021). The DSM-V criteria stipulate that a minimum of five traits must be present: grandiose self-worth, delusions regarding significant accomplishments, a craving for praise, feelings of entitlement, and a lack of empathy (Cain & Boussi, 2020). The case study patient asserts that she attracts individuals and receives favorable treatment in her workplace. Although she exhibits empathy, her symptoms frequently do not meet the diagnostic criteria for this condition.

 

Reflections: The presented case study exemplifies a patient experiencing delusions. She erroneously feels that her boss has sentiments of fondness for her and that she has the power to replace her supervisor. She is firmly persuaded that her job is at risk because of this. To establish the diagnosis, the PMHNP collected sufficient evidence via interviews with the patient’s supervisor and coworkers, with the patient’s cooperation, to obtain insight into her behavior at home. The patient’s parents might act as dependable chroniclers of her symptoms to grasp her condition better. Nonetheless, the patient rejected the chance, posing an ethical issue for the psychiatrist (Pellegrini et al., 2022). The PMHNP must protect the patient’s autonomy and confidentiality about her healthcare decisions, with the exception of circumstances where there is evidence indicating the patient presents a risk of damage to herself or others.

Conclusion

The case study illustrates a young adult female exhibiting signs of a delusional disease characterized by erotomania, as she believes she is in a love relationship with another individual. Her employer thinks she has the power to succeed her boss, jeopardizing her position. The case study emphasizes the need for a psychiatrist to collect information via interviews with her supervisor, coworkers, and parents to get a more thorough comprehension of her condition. The patient rejected the chance, creating an ethical issue. The PMHNP shall respect the patient’s autonomy and confidentiality about her healthcare decisions unless there is evidence indicating self-harm or damage to others.

References

Cain, N. M., & Boussi, A. (2020). Narcissistic Personality Disorder. In Springer eBooks (pp. 3088–3096). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_604

González-Rodríguez, A., Seeman, M. V., Izquierdo, E., Natividad, M., Guàrdia, A., Román, E., & Monreal, J. A. (2022). Delusional Disorder in Old Age: A Hypothesis-Driven review of recent work focusing on epidemiology, clinical aspects, and outcomes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 7911. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137911

Muñoz-Negro, J. E., Gómez-Sierra, F. J., Peralta, V., González-Rodríguez, A., & Cervilla, J. A. (2020). A systematic review of studies with clinician-rated scales on the pharmacological treatment of delusional disorder. International Clinical Psychopharmacology, 35(3), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1097/yic.0000000000000306

Oldham, M. A. (2021). Delirium disorder: Unity in diversity. General Hospital Psychiatry, 74, 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.11.007

Pellegrini, R., Negro, J. E. M., Ottoni, R., Cervilla, J. A., & Tonna, M. (2022). The affective core of delusional disorder. Psychopathology, 55(3–4), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1159/000522344

Uriawan, W., Manaf, K., Syaripudin, U., & Mujiburrahman, M. (2021). Expert system for diagnosing narcissistic personality disorders using certainty factor and forward chaining methods. IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering, 1098(3), 032095. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1098/3/032095

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

Psychotic disorders and schizophrenia are some of the most complicated and challenging diagnoses in the DSM. The symptoms of psychotic disorders may appear quite vivid in some patients; with others, symptoms may be barely observable. Additionally, symptoms may overlap among disorders. For example, specific symptoms, such as neurocognitive impairments, social problems, and illusions may exist in patients with schizophrenia but are also contributing symptoms for other psychotic disorders.

For this Assignment, you will analyze a case study related to schizophrenia, another psychotic disorder, or a medication-induced movement disorder.

Resources

 

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

 

Learning Resources

Required Readings

Required Media

Video Case Selections for Assignment

Select one of the following videos to use for your Assignment this week. Then, access the document “Case History Reports” and review the additional data about the patient in the specific video number you selected.

 

 

To Prepare:

  • Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide about assessing and diagnosing psychotic disorders. Consider whether experiences of psychosis-related symptoms are always indicative of a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Think about alternative diagnoses for psychosis-related symptoms.
  • Download the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template, which you will use to complete this Assignment. Also review the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Exemplar to see an example of a completed evaluation document.
  • By Day 1 of this week, select a specific video case study to use for this Assignment from the Video Case Selections choices in the Learning Resources. View your assigned video case and review the additional data for the case in the “Case History Reports” document, keeping the requirements of the evaluation template in mind.
  • Consider what history would be necessary to collect from this patient.
  • Consider what interview questions you would need to ask this patient.
  • Identify at least three possible differential diagnoses for the patient.

By Day 7 of Week 7

Complete and submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate primary diagnosis.

Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:

  • Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
  • Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment??
  • Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
  • Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over??Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

ORDER A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER HERE

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

  1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK7Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial
  2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.
  3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

 

Rubric

NRNP_6635_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

NRNP_6635_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Create documentation in the Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation Template about the patient you selected. In the Subjective section, provide: • Chief complaint• History of present illness (HPI)• Past psychiatric history• Medication trials and current medications• Psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis• Pertinent substance use, family psychiatric/substance use, social, and medical history• Allergies• ROS
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent

The response throughly and accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

17 to >15.0 ptsGood

The response accurately describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis.

15 to >13.0 ptsFair

The response describes the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis, but is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies.

13 to >0 ptsPoor

The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the patient’s subjective complaint, history of present illness, past psychiatric history, medication trials and current medications, psychotherapy or previous psychiatric diagnosis, pertinent histories, allergies, and review of all systems that would inform a differential diagnosis. Or, subjective documentation is missing.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome In the Objective section, provide:• Physical exam documentation of systems pertinent to the chief complaint, HPI, and history• Diagnostic results, including any labs, imaging, or other assessments needed to develop the differential diagnoses.
20 to >17.0 ptsExcellent

The response thoroughly and accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are thoroughly and accurately documented.

17 to >15.0 ptsGood

The response accurately documents the patient’s physical exam for pertinent systems. Diagnostic tests and their results are accurately documented.

15 to >13.0 ptsFair

Documentation of the patient’s physical exam is somewhat vague or contains minor innacuracies. Diagnostic tests and their results are documented but contain minor innacuracies.

13 to >0 ptsPoor

The response provides incomplete or inaccurate documentation of the patient’s physical exam. Systems may have been unnecessarily reviewed, or, objective documentation is missing.

20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome In the Assessment section, provide:• Results of the mental status examination, presented in paragraph form.• At least three differentials with supporting evidence. List them from top priority to least priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
25 to >22.0 ptsExcellent

The response thoroughly and accurately documents the results of the mental status exam…. Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides a thorough, accurate, and detailed justification for each of the disorders selected.

22 to >19.0 ptsGood

The response accurately documents the results of the mental status exam…. Response lists at least three distinctly different and detailed possible disorders in order of priority for a differential diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, and it provides an accurate justification for each of the disorders selected.

19 to >17.0 ptsFair

The response documents the results of the mental status exam with some vagueness or innacuracy…. Response lists at least three different possible disorders for a differential diagnosis of the patient and provides a justification for each, but may contain some vaguess or innacuracy.

17 to >0 ptsPoor

The response provides an incomplete or inaccurate description of the results of the mental status exam and explanation of the differential diagnoses. Or, assessment documentation is missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Reflect on this case. Discuss what you learned and what you might do differently. Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), social determinates of health, health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).
10 to >8.0 ptsExcellent

Reflections are thorough, thoughtful, and demonstrate critical thinking.

8 to >7.0 ptsGood

Reflections demonstrate critical thinking.

7 to >6.0 ptsFair

Reflections are somewhat general or do not demonstrate critical thinking.

6 to >0 ptsPoor

Reflections are incomplete, inaccurate, or missing.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Provide at least three evidence-based, peer-reviewed journal articles or evidenced-based guidelines that relate to this case to support your diagnostics and differential diagnoses. Be sure they are current (no more than 5 years old).
15 to >13.0 ptsExcellent

The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature to support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study. The resources reflect the latest clinical guidelines and provide strong justification for decision making.

13 to >11.0 ptsGood

The response provides at least three current, evidence-based resources from the literature that appropriately support the assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study.

11 to >10.0 ptsFair

Three evidence-based resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis of the patient in the assigned case study, but they may only provide vague or weak justification.

10 to >0 ptsPoor

Two or fewer resources are provided to support assessment and diagnosis decisions. The resources may not be current or evidence based.

15 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph development and organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. …Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.5 ptsGood

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. …Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3.5 to >3.0 ptsFair

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. … Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of the time.

3 to >0 ptsPoor

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. … Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Written Expression and Formatting—English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and punctuation
5 to >4.0 ptsExcellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors

4 to >3.0 ptsGood

Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

3 to >2.0 ptsFair

Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors

2 to >0 ptsPoor

Contains many (≥ five) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding

5 pts
Total Points: 100